
Lynching of Adolphus Monroe
Image of Coles County's first county clerk, Nathan Ellington.
|
![]() |
The First lynching in Coles County history took place on February 18, 1856. The lynching transpired, after Adolphus Monroe was convicted for the murder, of his Father-in-Law, and first Coles Country Clerk, Nathan Ellington. Nathan Ellington's death was a result of an argument between himself and Adolphus Monroe. Many sources, including the newspapers from the time, speculate that a disagreement between the two, led to a brutal altercation. During this fight, Adolphus Monroe pulled a pistol from his coat and fired on Mr. Ellington. Mr. Ellington died the same day, October 19, 1855, as a result of the wounds he sustained at the hands of Monroe. The trial of Adolphus Monroe concluded on January 24, 1856, when it was announced that he was to be hung for the death of his father-in-law. Two days before the hanging was to commence, a messenger from Governor Matteson arrived to delay the hanging for three months. The Newspaper accounts from the time make the case that a sizable number of people had already come to Charleston to witness the execution of Monroe. The sheriff, John R. Jeffries, printed four hundred copies of the document, sent by the Governor, which sited the reasons for the reprieve. This official document was intended only for the sheriff, not for public display. The document sent by the governor outlined the reasons why a stay was placed on the execution of Monroe. This document created a public frenzy for two reasons; one, was that the people were outraged that a guilty man, whom murdered one of the counties most respected citizens, was being show mercy by the government of the state. The second reason this event caused such a frenzy, was because it relieved the town from participating in the social activity that everyone in the county was amassing in Charleston to see. In circulating the document, the sheriff created an environment, which made it impossible to follow through with the orders handed down by the Governor.
A mob formed at the courthouse, to voice their opinions about the reprieve.
At this time, the mob began amassing anger towards the decision passed down
by the Governor. Speakers began voicing their opinions about what the populace
should do now that the decision to disallow the hanging had been made. The general
sentiment of the crowd seemed to echo the idea that the hanging should commence
anyway. Both James Cunningham, son of Nathan Ellington, and brother-in-law of
Adolphus Monroe, and Sheriff John Jeffries, attempted to appease the crowd that
had amassed in the town square. Their speeches were unsuccessful in detouring
the mob's frustration about the decision of the governor. Instead, the mob intensified
their rhetoric about carrying out the hanging. It was speculated, by the newspaper
accounts, that the sheriff had not intending to stop the mob from carrying out
their plan to hang Adolphus Monroe. It would seem that the speech, by the Sheriff,
was his effort to make it seems as though he was against the actions of the
mob. In the end, the frustration and emotions of the crowd boiled over and culminated
in an assault on the jail. The intention of the mob was to capture Mr. Monroe
and carry out the sentence the court of their county had handed down.
All at once, the mob decided to carry out their plan to carry out justice in
their town. By the time the mob decided to act their ranks, had been estimated,
to be between two and three hundred people. When the mob attacked the jail,
it took a long time for the people to break into the jail itself. Instead of
storming the jail, the mob simply began chipping away at the wall of the cell
that Mr. Monroe had been assigned to. Many sources speculate that the mob wavered
in their intent to capture Mr. Monroe during this time. The time it took to
actually break Monroe out of his cell was between one and two hours. During
this time though, the authorities were unwilling to make an effort to stop the
prisoner from escaping. Instead, armed guards were placed in the jail, not to
prevent the mob from coming in, but instead, the guards were posted there in
order to prevent the prisoner from escaping.
In the end, the mob succeeded in retrieving Mr. Monroe. Upon doing so, the
mob took him out of the city to a near by grove of trees where he was lynched.
With the deed accomplished, the mob paraded the body of Mr. Monroe around the
square of Charleston in celebration of their devious act.
The first lynching of Coles County had been carried out as an act of protest
against the Governor's reprieve. The people of the county did not see any need
for such a continuance, in the case of Mr. Monroe. The populace of the town
honestly believed that the only way to achieve justice in this case was to put
Mr. Monroe to death. Anything, including a reprieve issued by the governor,
was seen to be an action, which violated the beliefs of the people. The sheriff
of the county had a significant role in supporting the actions of the mob. To
be fair, his efforts helped raise the level of ferocity to allow the event to
transpire in the first place. Circulating the Governor's reprieve could have
only served in creating an atmosphere, which was conducive to upheaval. It would
seem, that the actions of the mob, even though encouraged by the sheriff, were
actually carried out as a way for the people of the town to voice their disdain
for such a blatant disregard for their justice system. The lack of control exhibiting
by the sheriff presents the possibility of this event simply being an act of
revenge carried out by Mr. Jeffries. This is a likely explanation, since he
exacerbated the situation, by spreading the Governor's document, and then failing
to quell the mob when he had the chance. At any rate, the lynching of Adolphus
Monroe is one of the most interesting and shocking events in the history of
Coles County.
|
Governor Joel A. Matteson This Image of Governor Matteson was retrieved from http://ilstatehouse.com/hallofgovernors.htm. |
![]() |
Coles County Jail Register.
|
Lynching
| Localités/Localities home | back |
last updated May 13, 2003
Copyright © 2000-03 by Localités/Localities, all rights
reserved.
This work may be copied for non-profit educational use if proper credit is
given to
Localités/Localities and/or
Coles County Legal History
Project.