|
Concentrations and Diversity of Bacteria in the Caribbean
Fruit Fly Anastrepha suspensa
K. Doyle, V. Norman, S. L. Daniel, and A. H. Fritz
Department of Biological Sciences, Eastern Illinois
University
Abstract
The Caribbean Fruit Fly (Anastrepha suspensa) is an important economic
pest of citrus in Florida. Interactions between A. suspensa and its
microbiota may allow for novel control strategies, but little is known about the
concentrations or types of resident bacteria in A. suspensa. This is the
first study to enumerate and identify bacterial species present in A.
suspensa. Pupae and adult female (mated) and male flies were surfaced
sterilized in 70% ethanol, rinsed twice in sterile water, and crushed. Fly
homogenates were serially diluted in sterile saline, plated onto Brain Heart
Infusion Agar with 0.5% yeast extract (BHIA-YE), and incubated for 72 hours at
37°C. Based on counts of colony-forming units (CFU) obtained with BHIA-YE,
bacterial concentrations in pupae, female flies and male flies averaged 7.8 x 103
CFU/mg (n = 13), 6.4 x 105 CFU/mg (n = 5), and 2.15 x 106
CFU/mg (n = 4) respectively. Five pupal isolates consisted of four Gram (-)
bacilli and one Gram (+) coccus. Twenty adult female fly isolates
included: seven Gram (-) bacilli; four Gram (-) cocci; three Gram (+) bacilli;
and six Gram (+) cocci. Most isolates were catalase (+) and oxidase (-). These
results indicate adult A. suspensa flies harbor higher concentrations of
bacteria than do pupae. Identification of isolates, using API 20E strips, found
a common bacterial type, Providencia sp., that resided in all female fly
subjects.
Introduction
There are many different genre of flies that are now
on record. There are 185 species alone that have been discovered in the genus
Anastrepha (Martinez and Hernandez-Ortiz, 1997). Most of the studies done on
Anastrepha have covered their anatomy and reproductive system of both
males and females (Martinez and Hernandez-Ortiz, 1997). The association of
bacteria with fruit flies has been known for nearly a century, but remains
little understood to this day.
Communities of microorganisms found in insects are largely diverse, and many
insect species have a large enough microbial load to far outnumber their own
cells (Dillon and Dillon, 2004). The fitness and longevity of a host can be
affected by bacteria inside the host (Brummel et al., 2004). In
laboratory-reared insects some of the beneficial relationships between the
bacteria and the host have been known to be intermittent or completely absent
(Dillon and Dillon, 2004). The bacterial population in any animal can be altered
drastically by their environment and diet (Brummel et al., 2004).
The Caribbean Fruit Fly, Anastrepha suspensa, belongs to the tephritid
fruit fly family, which are important insects in agriculture because of the
destruction of crops. There have not been many studies on the Caribbean Fruit
Fly, which was introduced into Florida in 1965 and infested over eighty kinds of
sub-tropical fruits such as cherries and citrus (Dodson, 1982).
|
 |
Figure 1.
A. suspensa: male (A) and female (B)
|
There have been few studies done on the bacteria
found inside of A. suspensa or any other species of Anastrepha. In
a close relative, Anastrepha luden (Mexican Fruit Fly), researchers
identified and isolated eighteen different bacterial species from the gut (Kuzina
et. al., 2000). The majority of the investigations on the role of associated
bacteria in fruit flies include studies on obligate symbiotic relationships in
larval growth and development, larvae nutrition, and bacteria as an adult food
source (Kuzina et. al., 2000). Determining the bacteria present within the fruit
fly would be economically beneficial because this could lead to possible
population control methods. Strategies for control may be obtained by studying
the relationship between the fruit fly and its resident bacteria.
Objectives
The objectives of the present study were to:
-
Optimize the culture medium for determining
concentrations of viable, culturable microorganisms present in A. suspensa;
-
Determine and compare microbial concentrations
present in pupae and non-virgin male and female adult flies A. suspensa;
and
-
Identify resident microorganisms present in A.
suspensa
Methods
Medium Optimization. To maximize colony
counts, three different enumeration media (e.g., Brain Heart Infusion (BHI)
Agar, Blood Agar, and Plate Count Agar) were tested.
Bacterial Enumeration. A. suspensa pupae were
obtained from mass-rearing facility in Florida. 24 hours after emergence, flies
were separated by sex. Upon reaching sexual maturity males and females were
allowed to copulate for 10 min; following copulation, flies were held in a -70ºC
freezer until processed.
Each fly was transferred aseptically to a sterile tea strainer using sterile
forceps. Flies in the tea strainer were processed as follows: 1) immersion and
agitation in 70% ethanol for 2 min; 2) a 30-sec wash (immersion and agitation)
in sterile DRO water; and 3) a second 30-sec wash in sterilized DRO water. The
surface sterilized fly was then transferred to a sterile 1.5 mL tube, and 1.0 mL
of 0.9% NaCl (saline) was added. The fly was then macerated for 5 min using a
sterile pestle. Another 0.5 mL of saline was added, and the contents vortexed
for 20 sec to ensure a homogenous fly puree.
Dilutions were performed by aseptically transferring 1.0 mL of the fly puree
into a 9 mL of sterile saline. After vortexing for 20 sec, serial 1:10 dilutions
were performed using 9-mL saline dilution blanks. Following serial dilutions,
0.1 mL from a dilution was aseptically transferred to a enumeration medium and
spread evenly over the entire agar surface using a sterile glass hockey stick.
For each dilution plated, triplicate plates were inoculated. Following
inoculation, plates were incubated at 37ºC for 72 hours and the number of
colonies were counted.
Identification of Isolates. Preliminary identification was initiated by
choosing colonies that differed morphologically and isolating the organisms.
Twenty isolates were obtained from the non-virgin female flies. For all twenty
isolates the following tests were performed: 1) determination of Gram reaction
via Gram staining, 2) catalase test to detect presence of catalase enzyme , 3)
oxidase test to detect the presence of cytochrome oxidase enzyme.
The identification process was continued by streaking isolates onto BHI agar
plates and incubating these plates for 24 hours at 37ºC. One colony from each
plate was transferred to 9.0 mL of sterile saline and mixed thoroughly until the
solution was slightly cloudy. Using a sterile pipette, the solution was
transferred into each tubule of an API 20E identification strip; strips were
incubated at 37ºC for 24 hours. After incubation, each tubule was assayed
according to standard APIC protocols (Biomérieux, France) and the isolates were
identified.
Results
In initial studies to determine which enumeration
medium produced the greatest colony counts, it was found that Brain Heart
Infusion (BHI) media produced the highest viable counts (Figure 2).
|
 |
Figure 2:
The average colony counts are shown for the three types of media that were
tested. These results were obtained using female flies 4 and 5.
|
Enumerations were used for the comparison of the
microbial loads in the male flies, female flies and pupae. It was found that
male flies had the largest microbial load, and the pupae had the smallest
microbial load (Figure 3). The average weights of the male flies, female flies,
and pupae were 9.0, 12,, and 9.0 mg, respectively.
|
 |
Figure 3:
The average viable counts for the female flies, male flies, and pupae are
shown. The data in this part of the experiment was calculated using units
of CFU/mg of fly/pupae. (CFU=Colony Forming Units) |
Preliminary identification performed on isolates
that were obtained from the enumeration plates were gram stains, catalase and
oxidase tests.
-
Gram stains showed five pupal isolates consisted of
four Gram (-) bacilli and one Gram (+) coccus, and twenty adult female fly
isolates included: seven Gram (-) bacilli; four Gram (-), cocci; three Gram(+)
bacilli; and six Gram (+) cocci (Figure 4).
-
Catalase test results showed eighteen catalase (+)
and one catalase (-) from female fly isolates, and five catalase (+) pupae
isolates.
-
Oxidase test results showed eignteen oxidase (-) and
one oxidase (+) from the female fly isolates, and four oxidase (-) and one
oxidase (+) pupae isolates.
|
 |
Figure 4: Gram stains of bacterial isolates
from flies. |
Using API strips (Figure 5), identifications were
obtained for eleven of the twenty isolates collected. The results obtained can
be found in Table 1.
|
 |
Figure 5: API-based identification of
bacterial isolates from flies. Image A shows an unused API strip, B is a
used API strip from the most common bacterial type found, and C shows the
colony morphology, on a streak plate. |
|
 |
Table 1: Identification results from API 20 E
The Fly # is read (media type/sex of fly and fly the plate) number/the
plate it came from/colony number from. |
Summary
Enumeration studies showed that male flies contained
the highest concentrations of viable, culturable microbes. Pupae compared to the
male and female flies had significantly fewer bacteria.
Of the fifteen isolates, only eleven could be identified using the API 20E
system. The most common bacteria isolated were Providencia alcalifaciens/Providencia
stuartii, which was found in all female flies processed. In order to
distinguish between the species of Providencia, more tests are needed. In
a study on the Mexican Fruit Fly, Anastrepha luden, eighteen different
bacterial species were identified: Enterobacter, Providencia,
Serratia, and Staphylococcus were the most common genera (Kuzina et.
al., 2000).
Currently, the Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services, has been
using many strategies to manage and control the Caribbean Fruit Fly (Weems Jr.
H.V. and Heppner J.B., 2001). One control method used has been the spraying of
groves and adjacent areas with pesticide bait. The studies that once emphasized
the insect-bacteria symbiosis are now geared towards the insect-microbial
pathogen relationship, to assist in production of microbial insecticides (Dillon
R.J. and Dillon V.M., 2004).
The identification of the bacteria that reside in the Caribbean Fruit Fly
provides insight into the significance of microorganisms in the life of the
fruit fly. This knowledge may prove important to creating a biological control
method of eradication of fruit fly pests.
References
Brummel, T., Ching, A., Seroude, L., Simon, A.F.,
Benzer, S. 2004. Drosophila lifespan enhancement by exogenous bacteria.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 101:12974-12979.
Dillon, R.J., Dillon, V.M. 2004. The Gut Bacteria of Insects: Nonpathogenic
Interactions. Annual Rev. Entomol. 49:71-92.
Dodson, G. 1982. Mating and Territoriality in Wild Anastrepha suspensa (Diptera:
Tephritidae) In Field Cages. J. Georgia Entomol. Soc. 17: 183-189.
Kuzina, L.V., Peloquin, J.J., Vacek, D.C., Miller, T.A. 2000. Isolation and
Identification of Bacteria Associated with Adult Laboratory Mexican Fruit Flies,
Anastrepha ludens (Diptera: Tephritidae). Current Microbiology. 42:
290-294.
Landbolt, P.J., Sivinski, J. 1992. Effects of Time of Day, Adult Food, and Host
Fruit on Incidence of Calling by Male Caribbean Fruit Flies (Diptera:
Tephritidae). Environmental Entomology. 21: 382-387.
Martinez, I.M., Hernandez-Ortiz, H. 1997. Anatomy of the Reproductive System in
Six Anastrepha Species and Comments Regarding Their Terminology in
Tephritidae (Diptera) Proc. Entomol. Soc. Wash. 99:727-743.
Weems Jr. H.V., Heppner, J.B. 2001. Caribbean Fruit Fly – Anastrepha suspensa.
DPI Entomology Circulars. 38 and 260.
Acknowledgements
We would like to thank Steve Malehorn, Dr. James
McGaughey, Sandra Baumgartner, and Suzanne Fraser. Korrin Doyle and
Valerie Norman each received an undergraduate research grant from the EIU
Department of Biological Sciences, in support of this project.
|