|
Population responses of wood frog (Rana sylvatica) tadpoles to
over-wintered bullfrog (R. catesbeiana) tadpoles
Leroy J. Walston and Stephen J. Mullin
Department of Biological Sciences, Eastern Illinois University
Abstract
In temperate latitudes, the larval stage of
bullfrogs typically lasts two years prior to metamorphosis. As such, ephemeral
ponds are not suitable breeding sites for bullfrogs. Other amphibian species
having shorter larval periods might breed successfully in both permanent and
ephemeral ponds. Larvae in ephemeral ponds, therefore, experience a different
community structure than those larvae of the same species in permanent ponds
where bullfrogs are also present. We examined the population responses of
sympatric wood frog tadpoles to native over-wintered bullfrog tadpoles. The
presence of an over-wintered bullfrog tadpole had a negative effect on the
growth of wood frog tadpoles allotopic (naïve) to bullfrogs, whereas the
presence of bullfrogs had no effect on growth of syntopic (experienced) wood
frog tadpoles. There were also differential behavioral responses of the wood
frog populations to over-wintered bullfrog tadpole visual and chemical cues.
Only allotopic wood frog tadpoles decreased activity levels and increased use of
refugia in the presence of over-wintered bullfrog tadpoles. These observations
indicate that over-wintered bullfrog tadpoles might exert a selective pressure
on other sympatric amphibians, and that bullfrog establishment within its native
range might have negative consequences on larval dynamics of other amphibian
species.
|
 |
Ranid larva |
Introduction
Bullfrogs (Figure 1) can regulate amphibian community structure (2) and
often out-compete syntopic amphibian species (7).
Bullfrog larvae development takes 2 years at temperate latitude, such that
larvae are present in early Spring when other amphibian larvae are
developing.
Over-wintered bullfrog larvae negatively effect growth and survival of
other larvae (1) through altering patterns of refuge use and foraging (3).
Wood frogs (Figure 2) alter their activity in response to predators (5), a
behavioral shift that might vary with experience (3).
|
 |
Figure 1. Ranidae: Rana catesbeiana |
|
|
|
|
 |
Figure 2. Ranidae: Rana sylvatica |
Purpose
To elucidate the mechanisms underlying the effects of bullfrog establishment
within its native range, we examined the responses of wood frog larvae from
populations that are either syntopic or allotopic to bullfrogs.
Hypotheses
Null #1: Behavior, growth and survival of wood frog larvae are not affected by
over-wintered bullfrog larvae.
Null #2: Responses to bullfrog larvae do not differ between allotopic and
syntopic wood frog populations.
Methods
-
8 wood frog egg masses collected in Coles Co., Illinois, in early March 2005 – 4
from ponds lacking bullfrogs (allotopic/‘naïve’) and 4 from ponds with
established bullfrogs (syntopic/‘experienced’).
-
Egg masses incubated in aquaria at 20 °C and 12:12 h L:D photoperiod. Larvae
transferred to cohort-specific aquaria containing native water.
-
Bullfrog larvae seined from syntopic ponds – Gosner stages 30-35, mass = 7.32 ±
1.84 g (mean ± 1 SE).
Independent variables were population (experienced vs. naïve) and bullfrog
larvae (1 present vs. absent/’control’). Each treatment had 5 replicates; MANOVA
analyses with Tukey-Kramer post hoc tests.
Growth/Survivorship (randomized block design)
-
Test aquaria contained 25 L water, 2 g leaf litter, 1 g of powered rodent chow,
and 20 wood frog larvae (Gosner stages 26-30).
-
Dependent variables were growth (change in mass, ± 0.01 g) and survivorship over
two weeks.
Activity/Refuge Use (2x2 factorial design)
-
Test aquaria contained 20 L water, 20 wood frog tadpoles, a 12-cm deep ‘bullfrog
enclosure’ (restricted physical presence, Figure 7), and a 1-cm deep layer of leaf
litter in one half of aquaria.
-
Dependent variables were activity (larvae moving, sensu 5) and refuge use
(larvae occupying leaf litter layer), both sampled 3 times within each
replicate.
|
 |
Figure 7. Enclosure for bullfrog larva
in aquarium with wood frog larvae. |
Results
Wood frog larvae – especially those from allotopic/naïve populations –
exhibited changes in the measured variables when a bullfrog larva was present
(*p = 0.05; **p = 0.001).
| Variable |
Population
|
% change from control |
| |
|
|
| Growth (Figure 3) |
naïve
|
– 61.9** |
| |
experienced
|
– 13.2
|
| |
|
|
| Survivorship (Figure 4) |
naïve
|
– 11.7* |
| |
experienced
|
– 8.7*
|
| |
|
|
| Activity (Figure 5) |
naïve
|
– 57.5** |
| |
experienced
|
– 18.8
|
| |
|
|
| Refuge use (Figure 6) |
naïve
|
+ 43.1* |
| |
experienced
|
– 5.4
|
 |
|
Figure 3. Wood frog larval
growth in response to presence of a bullfrog larva. Response values are
shown as means ± 1 SE in all figures. |
| |
|
|
 |
|
Figure 4. Wood frog larval
survivorship in response to presence of a bullfrog larva. |
| |
|
|
 |
|
Figure 5. Wood frog larval
activity in response to presence of a bullfrog larva. |
| |
|
|
 |
|
Figure 6. Refuge use by wood
frog larvae in response to presence of a bullfrog larva. |
Conclusions
-
Bullfrog larvae had negative effects on fitness traits of wood frog larvae;
significant population-by-bullfrog interactions indicate that these effects were
greater for naïve wood frogs.
-
Reduction in larval growth rate is likely linked to reduced activity (5) and
increased use of refugia (4).
-
Because size at metamorphosis confers greater adult fitness (6), the presence of
over-wintered bullfrog larvae influences wood frogs beyond the interval of
interaction.
-
Just as wood frog larvae can respond to other predators (4,5), those in syntopic
populations appear to have adapted to the presence of over-wintered bullfrog
larvae.
-
Management of pond hydroperiod can limit the impacts of bullfrog dispersal, both
within its native range and elsewhere.
References
(1)
Boone et al., 2004, Copeia 2004:683-690.
(2)
Hecnar & M’Closkey, 1997, Amer. Midl. Nat. 137:145-150.
(3)
Kiesecker & Blaustein, 1997, Ecology 78:1752-1760.
(4)
Petranka & Hayes, 1998, Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 42:263-271.
(5)
Relyea, 2002, Ecol. Monogr. 72:523-540.
(6)
Werner, 1986, Amer. Nat. 128:319-341.
(7)
Werner & Anholt, 1996, Ecology 77:157-169.
A paper based on this presentation is forth-coming in J. Herpetol.
Acknowledgements
We collected specimens under an Illinois Department of Natural Resources
scientific collecting permit (#NH05-0946) and conducted this study in
accordance with Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee guidelines
(protocol #04-008). We are grateful to L.B. Hunt, D. Mott, and R.A.
Szafoni for their support of this research, and thank EIU for partially
defraying costs associated with the project.
|