|
Biotic
assessment of water quality in the Sangamon River
Charles
L. Pederson, Robert U. Fischer, Kristen M. Thomas and Shari E. Fanta
Biological
Sciences Department, Eastern Illinois University, Charleston, IL
INTRODUCTION
 |
.
. . The face of the water, in time, became a wonderful book - a book
that was a dead language to the uninformed passenger, but
which told its mind to me without reserve,
delivering its most cherished secrets as clearly
as if it uttered them with a voice. And it was not a book to be read
once and thrown aside, for it had a new story to tell every day.
Mark
Twain, Life on the Mississippi, 1883. |
 |
The
Sangamon River. |
The
Sangamon River drains a primarily agricultural,
14,000 km2 watershed before joining the Illinois River
north of Beardstown. Along its length, the river has been
impounded to form several reservoirs which ensure a stable
water supply as well as numerous recreational
opportunities for over half a million people. Included
within this watershed are urban areas such as Bloomington,
Decatur, and Springfield. As a result of human demographics and the primarily
agricultural land use within the watershed within, habitat
quality and suitability of the river for support of
aquatic life has been challenged for most of the last
century. Since 1998 in conjunction with the Sanitary District
of Decatur, we have been working to evaluate the ability of
the Sangamon River to support a healthy stream biota.
Why
Biotic Assessment? For centuries, coal miners
took canary birds down into their mines to warn of
potential disaster. If a mine shaft collapsed thereby diminishing
the oxygen supply or if toxic gasses such as methane began
to accumulate, the canary would be the first to react. Death of
the biomonitor would alert miners to trouble and enable them to take
immediate action in the interest of safety. Over the years, it is rumored
that this yellow songbird saved countless lives. The
common example of the "canary in the coalmine" reveals the utility of
biotic assessment. From such organisms (biological monitors), we can learn much
about the quality of our atmosphere as well as our immediate terrestrial and
aquatic environments. Such use of specific organisms in natural communities as
indicators of environmental quality was proposed in the early 1900s. Then
as well as now, it is known that biological monitors provide the following
benefits when compared to more routine assessment of physical or chemical
conditions:
They are very sensitive to changes in environmental quality.
They may respond to environmental conditions which often are not detectable via
routine analyses.
They integrate changes in environmental quality over time.
Biological
Monitors Respond to Inputs Which Alter Environmental Conditions
|
Discharges
- inputs to the river
(reservoir,
sanitary) |
 |
|
Altered
physical/chemical conditions
increased
sediment and nutrient loading elevated input of
chemical pollutants abnormal temperature regime
decreased habitat diversity. |
 |
|
Impact
on stream biota
decreased
diversity through loss of sensitive species and
persistence of those tolerant of degraded environmental conditions |
Our
Specific Objectives
1. Evaluation
of physical habitat via Stream Habitat Assessment Procedure (SHAP).
2. Analysis
of physical and chemical variables to describe "water quality"
in the Sangamon River.
3. Evaluation
of biotic indices based on fish, macroinvertebrates, and attached algal
communities for biotic assessment of stream quality.
Our
investigations focused on two reaches of the Sangamon River. Sites
9, 11, and 12 are located downstream of discharge from
the SDD main treatment plant. We refer to these as the
DOWNSTREAM sites. Sites
1, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8 are in the reach extending
upstream from the SDD discharge to the dam which impounds
Lake Decatur. We refer to these as the UPSTREAM sites.
The
majority of instream flow volume in the Sangamon River (upon leaving Decatur) is
derived from either sanitary or reservoir discharge.
 |
Sangamon River sites. |
 |
Discharge from the Main Treatment
Plant of the Sanitary District of Decatur. |
 |
Outflow from Lake Decatur into the
Sangamon River. |
Evaluation
of Physical Habitat Using SHAP
SHAP
(the Stream Habitat Assessment Procedure) was used to evaluate overall physical
habitat similarity for all sites within the two stream reaches. Values for 15
individual habitat parameters (which include evaluation of substrate and
instream cover, channel morphology and hydrology, and riparian and bank
features) were determined using standard assessment procedures. Values for each
of these metrics were then summed to provide an overall SHAP score.
Although SHAP scores for the two reaches of the Sangamon River
which we studied were significantly different - values for all sites still
resulted in classification of physical habitat as fair.
|
 |
SHAP
score categories:
Excellent
(> 142)
Good
(100-142)
Fair
(59-100)
Very
Poor (< 59)
|
Physical/Chemical
Characterization of Instream Flow
Routine
assessment of characteristic water quality variables can aid in understanding
the functioning of stream systems which are homogeneous in terms of overall
physical structure.
|
Some variables were measured
using field instrumentation |
|
|
Dissolved
oxygen
Temperature
Specific
conductance
pH
Depth
|
|
Water
samples were collected and returned to the laboratory for further analyses |
|
|
Turbidity
Solids
(suspended, dissolved, fixed, volatile)
Phosphorus
(soluble reactive, suspended, dissolved condensed)
Total
oxidized nitrogen
Ammonia
nitrogen
Hardness
Alkalinity
(total and phenolphthalein)
Chlorophyll
a
|
Results
 |
Principal
Components Analysis (PCA) was used to combine measured variables into newly
derived variables (PCA Factor 1, PCA Factor 2, etc.) which then may be used as
"overall" measures of similarity. |
Observations
at sites DOWNSTREAM of the SDD are clearly distinct from those in the reach that
extends UPSTREAM to the dam which impounds Lake Decatur. The
only overlap identified between the UPSTREAM and DOWNSTREAM reaches was the
clustering of Sites 8 and 12 into an "intermediate" group. Likely this
results from the movement upstream to beyond Site 8 of discharge from SDD when
reservoir flows are minimal (e.g., during July and August).
DOWNSTREAM
sites are characterized by higher plant macronutrient concentrations, i.e., in
the aggregate by elevated conductivity and fixed dissolved solids, but also
through specific measurements of phosphorus, oxidized nitrogen, and carbon as
indexed by alkalinity. In addition, discharge from SDD tends to lower the pH of
the stream - although not appreciably.
UPSTREAM
sites tend to have higher concentrations of suspended solids, likely due to
export of phytoplankton algae and fixed particles via outflow from Lake Decatur.
When
taken as a whole, it may be that the UPSTREAM reach relies most heavily on
allochthonous inputs of organic material to support overall community
metabolism, while discharges from SDD establish a basis for autochthonous
primary productivity in the DOWNSTREAM reach.
Physical
and chemical water quality confirms differences between the UPSTREAM and
DOWNSTREAM reaches, but qualitative judgments (good vs. bad)
require an evaluation of the biotic community structure.
Fish
were collected at each site using electric seining and standard boat
electrofishing techniques. Fish were identified to species, counted and returned
to the stream alive when possible, although voucher specimens were preserved and
retained. When field identifications were not practical, specimens were
preserved and returned to the laboratory. Data were used to calculate the Index
of Biotic Integrity (IBI) which incorporates species richness and composition,
fish abundance and condition, as well as trophic composition. IBI scores
indicate categories of habitat quality as follows:
51-60
(Excellent); 41-50.9 (Good); 31-40.9 (Fair);
21-30.9 (Poor); <21(Very Poor).
 |
Hester-Dendy sampler |
Macroinvertebrates
were collected using Hester-Dendy samplers. Samplers remained in the river for
an exposure period of six weeks, at the end of which they were retrieved.
Invertebrates were separated from the substrata and identified at least to
family in the laboratory. Data on relative abundance were used to calculate the
MBI (Macroinvertebrate Biotic Index) for each site. In this method, each taxon
is assigned a pollution tolerance value. According to the Illinois Environmental
Protection Agency, MBI values reflect water quality as follows:
<
5.0 (Excellent); 5.0-6.0 (Very good); 6.1 - 7.5 (Good/Fair); 7.6 - 10.0 (Poor)
> 10.0 - Very Poor.
 |
Floating artificial substrate |
Benthic
diatoms were collected on a floating artificial substrate that was placed at
each site for a three week colonization period. Accumulated material was removed
from the substrata, digested in acid and the resistant "shells " of
the diatoms were mounted onto microscope slides. Species were identified at
magnification of 1000x. Preliminary analyses have focused on qualitative
observation of shifts in dominance and appearance of rare species which may
indicate tolerance or sensitivity to ambient conditions in the two stream
reaches.
 |
Overall
mean IBIs for data pooled from 1998, 2001 and 2002 were 32 and 35 for the
UPSTREAM and DOWNSTREAM reaches, respectively. |
Statistically, this difference is
significant and suggests that overall habitat quality, based on the fish
community, is improved in the DOWNSTREAM reach. DOWNSTREAM sites associated with
the main treatment plant outfall from the Sanitary District of Decatur and may
have increased IBI rating due to the predictable instream flows increased
autochthonous primary production.
 |
MBI scores averaged over the 2001 and
2002 study periods at the UPSTREAM and DOWNSTREAM sites were 7.3 and
6.1, respectively. |
Although both of these scores
warrant a good/fair rating, the average MBI for the DOWNSTREAM reach is
significantly lower indicative of improved habitat quality. Recent MBI values
for the Sangamon River associated with the Sanitary District of Decatur are
lower than values reported by the Illinois Environmental Protection Agency (IEPA)
in 1988, suggesting improvement of Sangamon River water quality during the past
decade.
Common Dominant Species in both stream reaches included: Cyclotella
meneghiniana, Nitzschia
palea, Nitzschia
valdestriata and Navicula
vaucheriae.
Common Dominant Species specific to a given stream reach included: Achnanthes
linearis, Gomphonema
parvulum, Amphora
ovalis, Achnanthes
exigua, Navicula
menisculus and Navicula
protracta.
Rare Species specific to a given stream reach included: Cocconeis
placentula, Gomphonema brasiliense, Cyclotella
stelligera, Cymbella
tumida, Pleurosira
laevis, Nitzschia
dissipatta, Aulacoseira
italica and Caloneis
hultenii.
Qualitative
comparisons of shifts in community dominance currently are possible. While
certain species appear to be cosmopolitan throughout the Sangamon River, both
reaches are characterized by somewhat unique subordinate taxa. Additional
refinement of diatom community data is necessary before relationships to stream
water quality become apparent.
SUMMARY
Overall,
biotic community structure and habitat characterization suggest that the
Sangamon River from Lake Decatur to the Wyckle's Road overpass in Decatur, IL is
a physically homogeneous system. Established biocriteria including fish and
macroinvertebrate indices suggest that discharge from the SDD main treatment
plant actually enhances quality of this stream resource. Although fauna may be
responding positively to elevated primary production derived from nutrient
inputs to the stream, biotic communities of the Sangamon River most likely
benefit from the more constant instream flows resulting from discharge of
treated effluent. In future years, emphasis will be placed on evaluating the
presumed positive impact of the SDD on stream communities relative to what we
believe might be the detrimental effect of extremely variable flows upstream of
the plant resulting from the highly variable releases of water from Lake
Decatur.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
Major
funding for this ongoing project has been provided by the Sanitary District of
Decatur. Additional support has been provided by the Department of Biological
Sciences, Eastern Illinois University. All of the following individuals have
provided field, laboratory or other technical assistance: Chris Huggins, Scott
Meiners, Nathan Badgett, Eden Rawski, Brian Metzke, Pat Enstrom, G. Matthew
Groves, Ross Widinski, Scott Seeley. |