|
Composition and Demographics of Beaver Colonies in Illinois
Stan McTaggart and Tom Nelson
Department of Biological Sciences, Eastern Illinois University
BACKGROUND
Beavers (Castor canadensis) are an important wildlife species because of
their commercial and recreational value to trappers, their potential as nuisance
animals and their role as a keystone species capable of creating wetland
habitats for a variety of other wildlife. For these reasons, this species is
managed intensively to maintain populations at levels compatible with available
habitat and public acceptance. Such management requires accurate information on
population densities and trends. Although beavers occur throughout Illinois,
neither population estimates nor direct indices of abundance are available.
There is a need to develop better methods to estimate and detect changes in the
relative abundance of this species on regional and statewide scales.
Biologists at Eastern Illinois University and Southern Illinois University at
Carbondale are working in collaboration with the Illinois Department of Natural
Resources to develop a framework for monitoring beaver populations by using
helicopter surveys. Beaver colonies and signs of activity can be readily
observed from the air. But these are useful only if we know the size and
composition of a typical colony and the variation among colonies. This study was
conducted to investigate the size, composition and reproductive potential of
beaver colonies in Illinois.
OBJECTIVES
1. Estimate the size and sex-age composition of typical beaver
colonies.
2. Compare the composition of whole colonies versus that of harvested samples
taken by trappers.
3. Estimate the reproductive potential of female beavers in Illinois.
4. Compare the efficacy of night-vision censuses versus removal trapping for
estimating colony size.
STUDY AREA
Beaver colonies were located by conducting ground searches of
suitable habitats in central and southern Illinois during the 1999 and 2000
trapping seasons. Beavers usually occupied bank dens adjacent to lakes, rivers
or ditches (Figure 1); lodges were rare. A random sample of thirty colonies was trapped,
such that complete removal of all individuals in each colony was accomplished.
 |
Figure 1. Typical Bank Den |
METHODS
Beavers were trapped from research colonies using #330
conibear traps until none remained in the lodge. In addition, we solicited
skinned carcasses from local trappers. Because the latter were taken from
colonies that were not completely trapped out, this sample was not
necessarily representative of the whole population. Each beaver was sexed,
aged and weighed. Beavers were aged based on the eruption, degree of basal
closure and deposition of cementum annuli on the premolars and molars.
Reproductive organs from females were removed and examined for ovarian
structures (corpora lutea and corpora albicantia), placental scars and
fetuses.
To provide a second estimate of the number of beaver in each colony, we
conducted censuses at each colony using night-vision binoculars. These
counts were conducted for 2.5 hrs following sunset by an observer sitting
10-15 m downwind from the lodge or den. Beaver were counted as they
emerged and moved around the food cache and surrounding area. Only beaver
that could be identified as unique individuals were counted, providing a
conservative estimate of the number present.
RESULTS
Size and Composition of Beaver
Colonies. A total of 239 beaver was trapped, including 169
from research colonies and 70 taken by cooperating trappers. Males
comprised 53-55% of the kit, yearling and adult classes. The mean colony
size was 5.6 beavers with individual colonies ranging from 2 to 11.
Colonies tended to be largest in lacustrine habitats and smallest in
ditches. A typical colony consisted of a pair of breeding adults, 1-2
yearling or older offspring, and 2 kits (Figure
2).
 |
Figure 2. Sex-age composition
of a typical colony. |
An additional adult was found in 43% of
the colonies. However, we found no correlation between the number of
adult “helpers” in the colony and the number of kits raised. Individuals
in our sample ranged in age from 0.5 to 15.5 years old. The age
distribution of trapped-out colonies differed from those taken by
cooperating trappers (P=0.04). Trappers harvested relatively more 1.5
and 2.5 year-olds and fewer older beaver (Figure 3), suggesting that the
composition of statewide harvests is not representative of the
composition of the whole population.
 |
Figure 3. Trapped beaver age
classes. |
Reproductive Rates of Female Beavers.
No kits and few yearlings ovulated; however,
53% of 2.5 year-olds and 77% of all older females ovulated. Ovulation
rates ranged from 2.5 ova/female in yearlings to 4.4 in older females.
Relatively few females (N=22) were trapped late enough in the season to
carry fetuses, but of those that did, the mean number of fetuses was 3.4
for 2.5 year olds and 4.3 for older females (Table 1). There was a
positive correlation between the weight of the female and the number of
ova shed (r=0.64, P=0.01). We estimated prenatal mortality to be 13%.
Based on the ages of the breeding females in our research colonies and
age-specific fetal rates, these colonies should have produced 110 kits
at birth. However, during the winter only 47 kits were present,
suggesting that mortality rates during the first 6 months of life is
~57%. The reproductive performance of these beavers is consistent with
populations occupying saturated habitat.
 |
Table 1. Age-specific reproductive
rates of female beavers harvested in Illinois. |
Comparison of Night-Vision Censuses with Removal
Trapping.
Night-vision censuses consistently under-estimated the actual size of
beaver colonies. The mean number of beaver observed was 2.9; the mean
number actually present was 5.3. Night-vision censuses accounted for
only 55% of the beavers present. However, a strong positive correlation
(r=0.80) was found between the number observed and the number present.
Based on censuses and complete removal trapping at 16 colonies the
number of beaver present can be estimated with the equation:
No. of beavers in colony = (1.33 X No. of beavers observed) + 0.5
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
This study was funded by the Federal Aid in Fish and Wildlife
Restoration Project W-135-R, the Illinois Department of Natural Resources and
Eastern Illinois University.
|